Sunday, May 17, 2020

Iraq - military campaign Essay - 3394 Words

Abstractnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1 1.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Introductionnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;2 2.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Past experiencenbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;2 3.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Diplomatic problemsnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;2 4.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Concept of Operationnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;3 5.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The campaignnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;3 5.1.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Air powernbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;4 5.2.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Ground operations and special forcesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;5 5.3.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Iraqi strategy and tacticsnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;5†¦show more content†¦The promise of a decade of development of high technology air power was expected by some to show a new way of fighting wars. The evidence from the campaign appears to give a more mixed message. Certainly, a higher percentage of air weapons was guided in this conflict than in any previous war. Strategic intelligence appears to have been less accurate than had been expected. The unexpected initial resistance by Iraqi forces, followed by later surrender, required flexible coalition operations. The vision of the use of chemical and biological weapons proved groundless. The efficiency of special operations will be one area for deeper revision. The media policy will need reviewing for future operations. At this stage, the article does no more than record the sequence of events, make broad judgements about the strategic and tactical approaches of both the Coalition and Iraqi forces, and highlights areas where further investigation may be useful to draw firmer conclusions. 1.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Introduction On 20th March 2003 US president George W. Bush launched a military campaign against Iraq. Its codename was Operation Iraqi Freedom. It has different names in other coalition countries, but one common denominator amp;#8211; it still doesnamp;#8217;t have a formal conclusion. Although the end of major military operations was declared on May 1st 2003, it is clearly obvious now one yearShow MoreRelatedThe Weaknesses And Weaknesses Of Phases Iv V And The Initial Strategic Assumptions That Affected Cdruscentcom s Oa1093 Words   |  5 Pagescomprehensive unified plan in support of OIF. This failure enabled the post regime change of Iraq to set the foundation for the insurgency that would start to grow in 2004. The second weakness was the strategic assumptions of OIF that were never validated before the commencement of phases I-III and not assessed immediately after phase III concluded. These strategic assumptions were â€Å"that the military campaign would have a decisive end and would produce a stable security environment; that U.S. forcesRead MoreThe Future Effect Of The Election Of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau1131 Words   |  5 Pageseffect of the election of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in terms of the Canadian foreign policy in the restructuring of military intervention in foreign affairs and the pro-trade globalization mandates of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Trudeau’s election defines the overriding political agenda of the Liberal Party of Canada to stop ineffective bombing missions in Syria and Iraq, yet to maintain special forces troops to better manage the war against ISIS. More so, Trudeau supports the globalizationRead MoreEvaluation of the US Central Comma nd’s Planning Process for Operation Iraqi Freedom1884 Words   |  7 Pageswide range of actions. Planning for joint operations requires input from many sources to produce a successful campaign plan to meet the desired end state. Operational design provides a concept and a construction framework that underpins a campaign and its execution. (JP GL13). Evaluating the planning process by using the operational design identifies some of CENTCOM’s shortfalls. US military planners’ lack of understanding of the operational environment led to an inadequately defined problem that resultedRead MoreAnalytical Review of Cutting the Fuse1314 Words   |  5 Pagesexact opposite of the rhetoric that was presented to the American public. Instead of blaming Islamic extremists, they instead come to the conclusion, â€Å"that military occupation is the main factor driving suicide terrorism† (Pape Feldman 10). Furthermore, they also put forth the argument that our current military strategies involving military occupation are counter-productive because rather than deterring violence, it actually increases suicide-bombings committed against American forces. In thisRead MoreThe Islamic State ( Is A Militant Movement Based On A Fundamental Doctrine Of Islam1646 Words   |  7 Pagesultimate defeat of ISIS before it can further endanger the U.S. and its citizens (NSS). Background: ISIS, having occupied territory in western Iraq, eastern Syria, and Libya, commands great authority, both political and theological, over Muslims across the world. Since the group’s 2003 origins, it has capitalized on the disenfranchisement of Sunni Muslims in Iraq and Syria – particularly in Syria, where a civil war that erupted from an uprising against President Bashar al-Assad gave way to the group’sRead MoreU.s. Military Campaign Planning1650 Words   |  7 PagesThe 2003 invasion of Iraq, Operation IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) provides an excellent case study to evaluate military campaign planning. OIF demonstrates the complexity of campaign planning, while providing relevant lessons for today’s planners and leaders. OIF was successful in achieving its initial tactical objective of capturing Baghdad. However, due to a insufficient understating of the operational environment (OE) and a poorly defined problem, OIF’s initial operational approa ch failed to achieve strategicRead MoreGlobal War On Terrorism And Terrorism1367 Words   |  6 Pageswere killed, over 6,000 people were injured, and about $10 billion in structural and infrastructure damages was caused. The cost added up to $3 trillion in total.   Ã‚  Ã‚   The Global War on Terrorism is a metaphor of war referring to the global military campaign led by the United States of America. The war is a NATO operation being led by the U.S. Being a NATO operation, it automatically brings more than 20 allies to the U.S.’s side of the conflict. The U.S. also has multiple non-NATO allies in the WarRead MoreThe United States And The Middle East1653 Words   |  7 Pages Over the past decade, wars and interventions in the Middle East have broken up existing states, fostered sectarianism and destroyed infrastructures, creating the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. After years of revolutionary upheaval, the Arab world s old system is on the verge of collapse. The United States and other countries bear the blame for this emergence and growth of the indigenous movements like the Taliban, AL-Qaeda, and IS. Order in the Middle East has been undermined by corrupt andRead MoreThe Islamic State Of Iraq And Syria979 Words   |  4 Pages Many years ago ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) didn’t exist while the U.S was stationed in the country but that has drastically changed. Now ISIS is one of if not the most dominate transnational terrorist organizations in the Middle East coupled with sophisticated command, control, and logistical capabilities. But how did this come to be? Initially, Isis is the aftermath of a genocide that continued after the U.S left the territory. the result of 200,000 murdered Syrians and of millionsRead MoreHonor, Fear And Interest Are Thucydides’S Reason For War.(Site)The1567 Words   |  7 PagesHonor, fear and interest are Thucydides’s reason for war.(site) The On 20 March 2003 the United State chose to invade Iraq for all three of these reasons. President George W Bush made the decision and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and CENTCOM Commander, General Tommy Franks executed the mission. All three men shared responsibility for the less than effective initial planning for the war that set the United States on the road toward ultimate defeat. CENTCOM initial planning for Iraqi Freedom

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.